<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UFC &#38; MMA News , MMA Videos , UFC Tickets &#187; Diego Sanchez</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fightmania.com/tag/diego-sanchez/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fightmania.com</link>
	<description>Latest MMA News &#38; MMA Videos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>MMA Roundup: 5 Round Non-Title Fights, Dana White</title>
		<link>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/mma-roundup-5-round-non-title-fights-dana-white/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/mma-roundup-5-round-non-title-fights-dana-white/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 04:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hartley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MMA Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Liddell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dana White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diego Sanchez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Horn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lyoto Machida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Hughes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randy Couture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reza Madadi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rich Clementi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royce Gracie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superior Challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thales Leites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tito Ortiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightmania.com/?p=7459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tomorrow will be all about UFC 129, with previews of each of the preliminary and main card bouts coming to you before the fights begin. In the meantime, there are some other things worth talking about, including one very welcome change that I have personally wanted to see for some time now. Five round non-title [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="highslide" onclick="return vz.expand(this)" href="http://www.fightmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/dana-white.jpg"><img src="http://www.fightmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/dana-white-300x199.jpg" alt="" title="dana white" width="300" height="199" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-7460" /></a>Tomorrow will be all about UFC 129, with previews of each of the preliminary and main card bouts coming to you before the fights begin.  In the meantime, there are some other things worth talking about, including one very welcome change that I have personally wanted to see for some time now.</p>
<p><strong>Five round non-title fights are on their way</strong></p>
<p>During the Fan Expo Q&#038;A that was a part of the UFC 129 weekend in Toronto, Dana White gave very welcome news by saying that the UFC is &#8220;very close&#8221; to implementing five round non-title fights.</p>
<p>Now, this wouldn&#8217;t be for all fights, of course, but instead for &#8220;big fights&#8221;, with White&#8217;s example being Brock Lesnar&#8217;s upcoming heavyweight title eliminator versus Junior dos Santos.  In other words, it sounds like many of the fights that I wished had been given five rounds in the past- Liddell-Wanderlei, Couture-Vera, and most recently Penn-Fitch being examples that come to mind- may be the kind of fights he is talking about.</p>
<p>There are still a lot of questions, for instance: would a big name non-title fight like Penn-Fitch 2 be a five-rounder if there was also a title fight on the card, or will this only be implemented when a non-title fight is the main event?  But still, this is a step in the right direction.  I may be in the minority on this one, but I wouldn&#8217;t mind seeing all main card fights being five rounds.  Some would say they&#8217;d rather watch the prelims, but in most cases, the main card fights are the ones you most want to see; why not give them more time on the telecast?  For every three-round stinker that you wouldn&#8217;t want to see two more rounds of, there are great three-round fights that would be even more epic if they had ten more minutes of time.</p>
<p>Besides, since we basically get to see nearly all preliminary bouts on most cards these days between Spike TV, ION and Facebook, what&#8217;s the difference?  Let&#8217;s see some more of these big non-title bouts get decided by the fighters and not by the judges.  Lastly, having five rounds to judge gives the judges themselves two more chances to get it right.  Of course, it&#8217;s also two more chances to fuck it up.  Let&#8217;s just move on.</p>
<p><strong>Dana White has a lot to say</strong></p>
<p>What else is new though, right?  The always-entertaining (and always controversial) UFC president has weighed in on a lot of topics recently.  Like what, you ask?  Well, how about that he thinks Lyoto Machida&#8217;s recent string of bad luck has to do with money (he thinks Machida&#8217;s success made him change his style), and that Royce Gracie wants Matt Hughes again, but he&#8217;s reluctant to make that fight (or any other fight for Gracie) happen?</p>
<p>He&#8217;s also had time to get into a brief Twitter battle with Jenna Jameson, who took exception to jokes about Tito Ortiz not being liked by fans in the recent &#8220;Executive Iceman&#8221; video White posted (which depicted Chuck Liddell going about the duties of his new job in humorous fashion).  Jameson pointed out that White pays Ortiz &#8220;a ton of money&#8221;, which makes little sense as an argument against Ortiz being disliked by fans (bad guys sell tickets, too), and White told her to kindly &#8220;shut the fuck up&#8221;, advising Ortiz to &#8220;put her on a leash&#8221;.  White did say that the skit was nothing personal and that the Ortiz portion was just to play up the rivalry between Ortiz and Liddell, to which Ortiz said &#8220;thanks&#8221;.</p>
<p>Most interestingly, White has indicated that he&#8217;s going to talk to Strikeforce Welterweight Champion Nick Diaz about all of his recent boxing talk.  &#8220;I know for a fact that boxing isn&#8217;t for him, because I&#8217;ve been in boxing for years. All of the boxers wish they were involved with us.&#8221;  He added that he&#8217;ll be flying out to see Diaz and discuss the issue as soon as UFC 129 is over.  On that note, I say good for Dana, as I&#8217;m similarly unconvinced about the notion that boxing has greener pastures for MMA fighters than mixed martial arts does.  Diaz would not be a big name in boxing, and to depend on MMA fans to support his boxing endeavors is an iffy proposition, as well.  He&#8217;d have to essentially start all over, and only the big names in boxing are doing extremely well financially, anyway.</p>
<p><strong>Quick Shots</strong></p>
<p>&#8211;Randy Couture had some interesting comments for MMAFighting.com recently, telling them that one of his main reasons for wanting to retire while he&#8217;s still near the top of his game is to avoid the awkwardness that Chuck Liddell had to deal with at the end of his career.  &#8220;But I don&#8217;t want to stick around too long and have everybody talking behind my back like that and forcing me to make a decision that I really don&#8217;t want to make. I want to go out on my terms.&#8221;  Of course, it would have been easier for Liddell to do so if Dana White would have kept his advice between them and not been preemptively announcing the Iceman&#8217;s retirement for him at press conferences and during interviews, right?</p>
<p>&#8211;Strikeforce may not be mixing with the UFC completely at this point, but it&#8217;s also far from &#8220;business as usual&#8221;, as Lorenzo Fertitta is assisting in the negotiations with Fedor Emelianenko&#8217;s constantly frustrating management team for a possible fight with Strikeforce Light Heavyweight Champion Dan Henderson.  It&#8217;s a fight both fighters seem to want, but the key here, as always, is whether M-1 Global can feel that they&#8217;re leeching off of Fedor enough.  After all, Fedor&#8217;s only got so many fights left in him, and then M-1 will have to do what every other promotion in the world has had to do and try to make it on their own steam, instead of financing their shitty promotion with money earned by Fedor&#8217;s own greatness.</p>
<p>&#8211;In a fight that I really like, Matt Hughes will be returning to take on Diego Sanchez at a UFC event this upcoming fall, according to UFC officials.  The fight has been verbally agreed to at this point, and should be a good test for both men.  I&#8217;m excited to see what Hughes has left in the tank against a fighter who fights a somewhat similar style.  I thought this fight would eventually happen back when Sanchez had first won &#8220;The Ultimate Fighter&#8221;, but a lot has changed since that point.  Still should be a fun bout.</p>
<p>&#8211;Another fun bout that will actually be taking place outside of Planet Zuffa is the one this weekend between longtime MMA standout Jeremy Horn and former UFC middleweight contender Thales Leites.  People hate on Leites for the Anderson Silva fight, but this matchup could make for some great jiu-jitsu.  Also of note on the Superior Challenge card is a title fight between UFC veteran Rich Clementi and Swedish bad boy Reza Madadi, which should be a furious one if the near-altercation at the weigh-ins is any indication.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:akathatoneguy@hotmail.com"><em>E-Mail Jon Hartley</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/mma-roundup-5-round-non-title-fights-dana-white/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UFC Live: Sanchez vs. Kampmann Parting Shots</title>
		<link>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/ufc-live-sanchez-vs-kampmann-parting-shots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/ufc-live-sanchez-vs-kampmann-parting-shots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 23:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hartley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MMA Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alessio Sakara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Weidman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyrille Diabate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diego Sanchez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Rogan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Kampmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rousimar Palhares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Cantwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFC Live: Sanchez vs. Kampmann]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightmania.com/?p=6991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If fans still don&#8217;t realize that you can&#8217;t judge a card&#8217;s quality by name value alone, the third UFC Live on Versus event should have taught them that lesson for good. While it didn&#8217;t have the star power of a pay-per-view event, it was filled with quality fights from top to bottom, and even the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="highslide" onclick="return vz.expand(this)" href="http://www.fightmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/diego-sanchez-2.jpg"><img src="http://www.fightmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/diego-sanchez-2-300x206.jpg" alt="" title="diego sanchez 2" width="300" height="206" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6992" /></a>If fans still don&#8217;t realize that you can&#8217;t judge a card&#8217;s quality by name value alone, the third UFC Live on Versus event should have taught them that lesson for good.  While it didn&#8217;t have the star power of a pay-per-view event, it was filled with quality fights from top to bottom, and even the least impressive bouts had their moments (such as whenever Cyrille Diabate ever decided to actually strike his opponent).  Here are my thoughts on the event.</p>
<p><strong>Close doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean controversial</strong></p>
<p>As I noted before, I was highly disappointed with Joe Rogan&#8217;s inciting of fan sentiment both in the arena and among those viewing at home against the judges&#8217; decision in the Diego Sanchez-Martin Kampmann fight.  Rogan has long been comfortable with criticizing the performances of ringside officials and referees during his announcing duties, but has recently been more outspoken in his post-fight interviews (which, of course, are heard by all in attendance), as well.</p>
<p>Usually, it&#8217;s pretty humorous.  In fact, I would gladly pay $10 extra for UFC pay-per-views if they would split the screen to show cameras on the three individual judges&#8217; faces while Rogan is lambasting their decisions after fights.  That would be great entertainment, my friends.  I&#8217;ve often thought, how shitty must it be to be sitting there at ringside, listening to this guy rake you over the coals and encourage the fans to boo you even more lustily than before?</p>
<p>Except that last Thursday, it really wasn&#8217;t warranted.  MMA fans as a whole are not always as savvy as they could or should be, this being a young sport with a growing fan base and all.  Many of them do not seem to understand that not every close fight means that someone is being &#8220;screwed over&#8221; or that the decision is a bad one.  As a mature MMA fan, you need to admit to yourself that some rounds could go either way.  Personally, I think the second round of the Sanchez-Kampmann fight was one of those.</p>
<p>Fightmetric&#8217;s stats show that the second round was very close, indeed.  Sanchez threw just a few more strikes than Kampmann did, and landed just five less.  However, he also landed more power shots, and threw 25 more power punches than Kampmann did, as Kampmann focused on jabbing throughout the round.  Now, let&#8217;s not forget that &#8220;aggression&#8221; is one of the judging criteria.  Then, there&#8217;s the punch that wobbled Kampmann briefly.  Is it not fair to say that that punch could have swayed a judge or two?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not trying to convince you that Sanchez won.  I thought Kampmann won the first two rounds when I watched the fight, personally.  What I&#8217;m trying to do is illustrate that it was a close round that could have gone either way.  This is not the kind of fight that should inspire outrage.  Let&#8217;s save that for the truly bad decisions that have become more and more commonplace in the sport.  By this point, MMA fans should know better, and Joe Rogan should certainly know better.  The decision isn&#8217;t wrong simply because you don&#8217;t agree with it.</p>
<p>Worst of all, this partially-manufactured controversy has overshadowed a brilliant fight that featured gutsy performances from both competitors.  It&#8217;s just too bad that the story was presented as that of bad judging when it should be more about bad criteria and a poor scoring system that needs to evolve.</p>
<p><strong>Palhares does it again</strong></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re not impressed/surprised/intrigued by the fact that Rousimar Palhares&#8217; last three UFC wins have come by way of heel hook, you should be.  Check this out: before Palhares&#8217; first UFC win by heel hook at UFC 107, there had been one heel hook submission in the previous <em>forty-three</em> UFC events.  Now, there were between 10 and 12 fights on each of those events, placing the percentage of fights ending by heel hooks during that time period in the UFC at about .2%.  That percentage would probably hold up pretty well for the entire existence of the UFC, honestly.</p>
<p>In contrast, 42% of Palhares&#8217; UFC fights have ended by a submission via heel hook, and as I said before, his last three wins have come that way.  It&#8217;s incredible, actually.  There is one thing that does help explain the lack of heel hooks in the UFC that immediately comes to mind, and that is that they just aren&#8217;t attempted that often.  Heel hooks, like most leg locks, require the fighter to sit back and seize their opponent&#8217;s leg, giving up their top position on the mat and often leaving them vulnerable to strikes in the process.</p>
<p>Furthermore, they&#8217;re just plain hard to do.  How many times have you seen a fighter sit back for a leg lock, fiddle around with it for a bit, then just give up?  It happens all the time.  Combine that with the risk involved and the loss of position, and there isn&#8217;t a lot of incentive for most fighters to mess with them in the first place.  </p>
<p>Of course, the best explanation is that Palhares is very, very good at them.  And that&#8217;s scary, because heel hooks are possibly the most dangerous submission in all of MMA, since by the time you feel pain or discomfort, the damage is usually done and you&#8217;re nursing a serious knee injury.  Even in training, you have to be careful with heel hooks and make sure that you apply them carefully rather thank &#8220;cranking&#8221; them.  Since it&#8217;s a completely different matter in a real fight, Palhares&#8217; future opponents had better be prepared to tap quickly if they want to walk out of the cage on their own two feet.</p>
<p>[EDIT: Okay, so I was victimized by Sherdog.com's results on this one.  They have the win listed as a heel hook by Palhares, when it was actually via kneebar.  Since it was an unaired preliminary bout, I haven't been able to see it yet.  Still, even two heel hooks in 7 fights is good for 28.5%, which means you're 142 times more likely to see a heel hook in a Palhares fight than in any other UFC fight.]</p>
<p><strong>Quick Shots</strong></p>
<p>&#8211;For all my criticism of Rogan&#8217;s handling of the Sanchez-Kampmann decision, he was right on with his analysis of the strange Cyrille Diabate-Steve Cantwell bout.  Very rarely do you see a fight that is so one-sided, yet where the victorious fighter shows almost no interest in finishing his opponent.  Diabate did look visibly tired near the end of the fight, but he also looked strangely complacent throughout.  Did he not know that he could possibly win a nice bonus by knocking Cantwell out?  Did he simply not care?  Even though he dominated Cantwell, it&#8217;s hard to be very impressed with such a lethargic performance.</p>
<p>&#8211;Chris Weidman was impressive in his win over Alessio Sakara.  I thought Sakara might be crafty enough to outlast the youngster, but it only took one round for Weidman to make the necessary adjustments and start taking it to the UFC veteran.  Weidman should be a talent to watch if he can continue to evolve his game past simply using his wrestling talents.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:akathatoneguy@hotmail.com"><em>E-Mail Jon Hartley</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/ufc-live-sanchez-vs-kampmann-parting-shots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Live Blog- UFC Live: Sanchez vs. Kampmann</title>
		<link>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/live-blog-ufc-live-sanchez-vs-kampmann/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/live-blog-ufc-live-sanchez-vs-kampmann/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 23:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hartley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MMA Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alessio Sakara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Bowles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CB Dollaway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Weidman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damacio Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diego Sanchez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Munoz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Kampmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shane Roller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thiago Tavares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFC Live: Sanchez vs. Kampmann]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightmania.com/?p=6916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Diego Sanchez and Martin Kampmann headline a pretty stacked card tonight airing live on Versus, with two fights also being aired on Facebook. Tonight, there&#8217;s the potential for excellent fights, a gruesome submission via Rousimar Palhares, wrestler on wrestler action between Mark Munoz and CB Dolloway, and much more. Make sure to check it out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="highslide" onclick="return vz.expand(this)" href="http://www.fightmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Martin-Kampmann.jpg"><img src="http://www.fightmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Martin-Kampmann-300x191.jpg" alt="" title="Martin-Kampmann" width="300" height="191" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6917" /></a>Diego Sanchez and Martin Kampmann headline a pretty stacked card tonight airing live on Versus, with two fights also being aired on Facebook.  Tonight, there&#8217;s the potential for excellent fights, a gruesome submission via Rousimar Palhares, wrestler on wrestler action between Mark Munoz and CB Dolloway, and much more.  Make sure to check it out at 9 PM ET/8 PM CT as I kick off my live blog of the event.</p>
<p>Make sure to refresh regularly for updates!</p>
<p>8:01- Thanks to everyone who&#8217;s joining us at Fightmania.com for the live blog tonight.  I&#8217;ll let Mike Goldberg get us started with his favorite phrase- no, not the one about someone having a &#8220;definitive&#8221; advantage, the other one.  &#8220;Here we go!&#8221;</p>
<p>8:03- Well, anyone who was worried about Diego Sanchez no longer bringing the unintentional comedy thanks to his life changes can relax now.  His pre-fight interview, complete with freshly-shaved head and unblinking intense stare, starts the night off with plenty of laughs.  Kampmann takes a considerable lead for the &#8220;line of the night&#8221; award with &#8220;I&#8217;ll put him to sleep and he can &#8216;dream&#8217; all he wants&#8221;.</p>
<p>8:09- Our first fight is Brian Bowles vs. Damacio Page.  Bowles is still rocking the 80&#8242;s part and looking just like Dirk Diggler.  He tells Page in the pre-fight hype video, &#8220;You&#8217;re not the boss of me!  I&#8217;m the king!  I&#8217;m the king of Dirk!&#8221;  Okay, he doesn&#8217;t, but he really should.</p>
<p>8:13- We&#8217;re almost underway.  No surprise here, Diggler has the 4 1/2&#8243; reach advantage.</p>
<p>8:15- &#8220;The Angel of Death&#8221; almost sets new levels of morbidity for a nickname, even in MMA.  I think someone should just go the other way with it.  Take the nickname &#8220;The Love Master&#8221; or &#8220;Professor Hugs&#8221;.  How about &#8220;Cuddles&#8221;?  You have to be a badass to fight for these drunk, ravenous fans with that nickname.  &#8220;The Spider!  Cuddles!  Next!&#8221;</p>
<p>8:19- What a fight!  Page took it to Bowles early on, really working on his lead leg with heavy kicks, but an eye-poke led to Bowles saying &#8220;Eff this&#8221; and turning up the aggression.  A heavy uppercut hurt Page and a tight guillotine rendered him unconscious.  Page&#8217;s second loss to Bowles by submission.</p>
<p>8:22- Very god of Bowles to tell the referee Page was out.  Then again, maybe I&#8217;m giving too much credit, here.  I suppose if he didn&#8217;t tell the ref, he&#8217;d be trying to kill him, right?</p>
<p>8:24- Which leads me to one of my pet peeves in sports today: anytime an athlete isn&#8217;t a total dickbag, he or she is &#8220;classy&#8221;.  It&#8217;s classy when fighters shake hands after a bout, it&#8217;s classy when a basketball player helps another one up off of the floor, it&#8217;s classy when a fighter doesn&#8217;t talk shit about his opponent in the post-fight interview.  Really?  When did the bar for class get set so low that you can be classy by default if you&#8217;re not a jerk?  Classy isn&#8217;t graded on a curve, my friends: it&#8217;s pass/fail.  Great quote for your Facebook pages, by the way.  Spell my name right when you attribute it to me!</p>
<p>8:25- Bonus fight footage as we get to see Igor Pokrajac (I spelled that without double-checking; achievement unlocked) and Todd Brown fight.  I&#8217;d like to see a breakdown on the combined UFC records of fighters named &#8220;Todd&#8221;.  It can&#8217;t be good.</p>
<p>8:30- I guess the prelims were full of fighters making puzzling strategic decisions.  Brown initiated the clinch multiple times with Pokrajac even though he really needed to have a standup fight with him, and Steve Cantwell opted to stand up and let Cyrille Diabate off his back in the first round of their fight, leading to his demise.</p>
<p>8:33- Pokrajac just made the most gentlemanly call out of another fighter ever.  The recipient was Tito Ortiz, by the way.  I like it.  I think every fighter on the card should have agreed to call Tito out after winning, regardless of their weight class.  Come on, you wouldn&#8217;t laugh at that?</p>
<p>8:38- Jon Jones gets the interview treatment from Joe Rogan.  He really buys into his ability and says he thinks he&#8217;s already there, &#8220;there&#8221; being &#8220;the best light heavyweight in the world.  He just doesn&#8217;t think he&#8217;s had the chance to prove it.  I actually like his confidence.  You can&#8217;t jump out of nowhere to fight the top fighter in the world in your weight class without it.</p>
<p>8:39- Alessio Sakara continues the celebrity somewhat-look-alikes theme.  If only his English was better so he could shout, &#8220;Tonight&#8230;we dine&#8230;IN HELL!&#8221;  In comparison, we have Chris Weidman, who couldn&#8217;t get into his own post-fight party without being carded.</p>
<p>8:45- Continuing the theme even further (probably too far): Our referee is Gary &#8220;Lil&#8217; Lesnar&#8221; Copeland.  By the way, Sakara is almost Stevenson-esque, maybe even Danzig-esque in his ability to stay in the UFC regardless of his level of performance.  Not quite Bonner-esque, though.</p>
<p>8:48- Sakara is throwing some good combinations, but maybe not as good as Rogan is giving him credit for.  It&#8217;s pretty much left hook, right hook, right leg kick each time.  Most of the hooks are landing on Weidman&#8217;s arms, to boot.</p>
<p>8:50- Put me down for 10-9 Sakara for a rather pedestrian first round.  No, I mean <em>literally</em> pedestrian- Sakara keeps dropping his hands and walking around the cage between exchanges.  His activity level really dropped towards the end of the round, though I like his takedown defense so far.</p>
<p>8:53- Weidman is showing some capable ground and pound and good guard passing after getting his first takedown of the fight early in round two.  Sakara&#8217;s mystery cut that came seemingly out of nowhere in the first round is really getting sloppy.  Nothing like Edwin Dewees in &#8220;The Ultimate Fighter 4&#8243;, mind you.  In terms of gushiness, that&#8217;s the gold standard right there.</p>
<p>8:56- Rogan points out that the cut is a new one and not the one from the first round.  Awesome moment as Sakara wipes the blood off with Copeland&#8217;s shirt.  &#8220;Gimme yer shirt, bitch,&#8221; Rogan says to add his own personal caption to the moment.  Saves me the work.  Anyway, round two goes to Weidman, who had a lot more success with his takedowns and seems to be getting more comfortable out there.  I like Sakara&#8217;s ability to stand up and sweep from his back, as well as the body shots, though.</p>
<p>9:02- Sakara is really struggling now.  Weidman is securing each takedown with ease and Sakara can&#8217;t do much off of his back.  Stop me if you&#8217;ve heard that one before.</p>
<p>9:06- Sanity prevails as all three judges give the bout to Weidman, though no one gives the first round to Sakara.  Weidman has to be pleased to come in with a 4-0 record and win like this on two weeks&#8217; notice in his UFC debut.</p>
<p>9:12- With Jones out of the way, we get the obligatory Rogan-Shogun interview.  Nothing to see here.  Safe to say Shogun isn&#8217;t a title-holder in the Ultimate Charisma Championship.</p>
<p>9:14- If you like your striking sloppy and your fights grindy, get ready because Munoz-Dollaway is NEXT!  Dollaway bears a passing resemblance to Jim Carrey&#8217;s female bodybuilding character Vera de Milo from In Living Color.  I&#8217;m reaching at this point, but we&#8217;re gonna get through this celebrity lookalike thing unscathed, I promise.</p>
<p>9:17- Dollaway has a five inch reach advantage, but Munoz&#8217;s cauliflower ear advantage is just as decisive.  Call it a wash.</p>
<p>9:20- Munoz overcomes a bad mistake early on that allowed a takedown by Dolloway to tag Dollaway with a right hand and finish on the mat for a TKO.  The stoppage looked a bit premature, but as Munoz got off of Dollaway, Dollaway&#8217;s eyes were focused somewhere in the 20th row of the crowd, so we&#8217;ll call it good.  Of course, Dollaway recovers quickly after that and proceeds to throw Mario Yamasaki under the bus by protesting the stoppage, but you&#8217;ve gotta do what you&#8217;ve gotta do, right?</p>
<p>9:23- Why do fans boo the victorious fighter after a premature stoppage?  Not that this one was, but the question remains.  For that matter, why boo the winning fighter after a poor judges&#8217; decision?</p>
<p>9:24- We get a shot of Kenny Florian and Todd Harris wearing 3-D glasses, as apparently they&#8217;re commentating on the 3-D broadcast on Xfinity, whatever that is.  Those glasses are ridiculous, though.  They look like what people imagined the future would look like back in the 1950&#8242;s.  You know, like they would be right at home with flying, super shiny cars and silver reflective jumpsuits.</p>
<p>9:27- Another bonus prelim, with Thiago Tavares and Shane Roller getting the replay treatment.  Rogan notes that Tavares looks &#8220;very thick&#8221;, and it&#8217;s unclear whether he&#8217;s talking about his musculature or his eyebrows.  Those things look <em>impenetrable</em>.  Like an evil cartoon henchman&#8217;s hidden lair.</p>
<p>9:29- Tavares is sponsored by a salon, apparently.  Goldberg compares him to Vitor Belfort, maybe because everyone with fast hands is comparable to Belfort.  Or because Tavares looks like Belfort&#8217;s little brother.  Either way.</p>
<p>9:32- Roller isn&#8217;t setting up his takedowns with strikes and Tavares is having no trouble fending them off as a result.  10-9 round for Tavares to start.  I feel weird scoring fights that have already happened, by the way.</p>
<p>9:35- You know who Tavares really looks like?  If he had a mustache, he&#8217;d look exactly like John Oates of Hall &#038; Oa&#8211; Holy shit!  Roller lands a perfect straight right that floors Tavares out of nowhere and lead to a stoppage immediately after.  &#8220;Holy shitbuckets!&#8221; says my wife.  I concur.</p>
<p>9:45- Kampmann is out first for the main event and he comes out to Three 6 Mafia&#8217;s &#8220;It&#8217;s a Fight&#8221;.  Both a completely obvious statement <em>and</em> proof that he&#8217;s been watching Rocky Balboa.</p>
<p>9:46- Goldberg notes that Kampmann&#8217;s got more ways to win this fight.  I almost thought in WWE terms for a second there, like Dana White marched out Vince McMahon-style and declared that Sanchez can only win by submission or something.</p>
<p>9:47- Sanchez walks out to &#8220;La Bamba&#8221; but wears the same tough guy face he always does.  It&#8217;s a weird contrast.  It&#8217;s almost as if he&#8217;s challenging the song to remove his scowl, and you know what?  He&#8217;s winning.  Seriously, don&#8217;t put it past him, there&#8217;s about a 80% chance that it&#8217;s why he picked this song.  Or maybe because he&#8217;s crazy.  Or a little of both.  Let&#8217;s just move on.</p>
<p>9:50- Contrast in styles: Sanchez stares across the Octagon while making his best Clubber Lang face.  Kampmann smirks back and grooms his eyebrows.</p>
<p>9:52- Bonus observation: next time you see Diego Sanchez from a side view, check out how his forehead slopes right into his nose with nary a bump.  It&#8217;s weird.</p>
<p>9:53- Sanchez looks a bit flabby.  They start and Sanchez is throwing with the ferocity of a young Tito Ortiz.  Or at least the craziness of a young Ortiz.  Kampmann is calm and technical as always.  Kampmann stuffs the first takedown attempt of the night and drops Sanchez with a straight right for good measure.</p>
<p>9:54- Kampmann has the front headlock and Sanchez is bent over with one hand on the mat to avoid being kneed in the grill.  They need to change that rule so a downed opponent is simply someone on one or both knees, back, etc.  None of this &#8220;touch the mat to avoid having your face kneed in&#8221; crap.</p>
<p>9:57- The first round ends and it&#8217;s all Kampmann.  Sanchez&#8217;s face is a mess and he&#8217;s bleeding rather heavily out of his mouth.  He still manages to make the tough guy face, while Kampmann makes the &#8220;I&#8217;m really glad I&#8217;m not you right now&#8221; face.</p>
<p>9:59- Rogan says Sanchez&#8217;s corner wanted lots of takedown attempts with switches from single leg to double leg and so forth.  I&#8217;m not sure how well it will work, though.  Kampmann&#8217;s takedown defense has been remarkable so far.  Like Rogan said, &#8220;effortless&#8221;.  </p>
<p>10:01- Sanchez is working really hard for a takedown here, but Kampmann doesn&#8217;t even look challenged.  Sanchez swings for the faces but Kampmann is no worse for wear, other than a cut near his right eye.  This is turning into quite a fight.</p>
<p>10:03- For all the talk about the cut to Kampmann &#8220;changing the course of this fight,&#8221; Kampmann is still winning.  He&#8217;s landing the better shots for the most part, fending off takedowns with ease, and being more economical with his striking.  Of course, judges often reward activity over actually landing punches (see: Leonard Garcia), so who knows.</p>
<p>10:06- Sanchez picks up where he left off, landing a big right to the head, then to the body.  Rogan mentions Kampmann breathing out of his mouth, but Sanchez has been doing so since minute three of the fight.  Goldberg continues his assault on the cliche record, throwing in &#8220;bloodied, but not beaten&#8221; for good measure.</p>
<p>10:08- I am amazed at how Sanchez hasn&#8217;t gassed even for a second, even though he&#8217;s obviously not in his best shape.  He finally gets a takedown, but Kampmann stands quickly.  This round is up for grabs, and the fight probably is, as well.</p>
<p>10:10- Kampmann has definitely injured his right hand, and Sanchez is all over him with a minute left.  Sanchez is a freaking warrior.  After that first round, to keep going the way he has is incredible.  The horn sounds and the fight is over.  An early contender for fight of the year, and Sanchez just may have pulled it off.</p>
<p>10:11- It&#8217;s all about who the second round went to.  The first was Kampmann&#8217;s, and the third belonged to Sanchez for sure.  That said, I completely expect a 30-27 one way or another from at least one judge.</p>
<p>10:13- The cards are in and Diego Sanchez wins it.  Not Diego &#8220;The Nightmare&#8221; Sanchez, mind you.  Diego &#8220;The <em>Dream</em>&#8221; Sanchez.  Gutsy performance for sure.  Fans are booing and I&#8217;m really not sure why.  They must be hardcore Kampmann fans, if such a thing exists.  Sanchez is a <em>mess</em>.  Incredible comeback.</p>
<p>10:15- Both fighters think they won and that&#8217;s fair enough.  It hinges on the second, and that was a close round (I gave it- and the fight- to Kampmann, personally).  I&#8217;m not sure why every close fight has to be turned into a controversy, though.  It&#8217;s a close fight!  That second round could go either way.  I&#8217;m surprised to hear that Rogan backs Kampmann for the second round, considering how he was reacting to everything Sanchez did that round.  He even acknowledged that Kampmann was hurt twice in the second round.</p>
<p>10:19- At any rate, a great night of fights.  Nearly all of them delivered, and best of all, they were free.  Thanks for joining me, everyone.  Make sure to check back later this week for both my thoughts on tonight&#8217;s fights and UFC 127.  Have something to say?  E-mail me at akathatoneguy (at) hotmail.com.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:akathatoneguy@hotmail.com"><em>E-Mail Jon Hartley</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/live-blog-ufc-live-sanchez-vs-kampmann/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UFC Live: Sanchez vs. Kampmann Preview</title>
		<link>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/ufc-live-sanchez-vs-kampmann-preview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/ufc-live-sanchez-vs-kampmann-preview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 23:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hartley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MMA Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alessio Sakara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Bowles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CB Dolloway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Weidman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyrille Diabate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damacio Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danny Castillo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diego Sanchez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Stevenson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Munoz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Kampmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rousimar Palhares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Cantwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Takeya Mizugaki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFC Live: Sanchez vs. Kampmann]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightmania.com/?p=6912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too much MMA is never a bad thing, and free fights just sweeten the deal even more. Tonight we&#8217;ll see whether Diego Sanchez can take another step toward revitalizing his career or whether Martin Kampmann can start the march back to title contention as the UFC brings another event to Versus. With two live fights [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="highslide" onclick="return vz.expand(this)" href="http://www.fightmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/diego-sanchez.jpg"><img src="http://www.fightmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/diego-sanchez-300x157.jpg" alt="" title="diego sanchez" width="300" height="157" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6913" /></a>Too much MMA is never a bad thing, and free fights just sweeten the deal even more.  Tonight we&#8217;ll see whether Diego Sanchez can take another step toward revitalizing his career or whether Martin Kampmann can start the march back to title contention as the UFC brings another event to Versus. With two live fights from the prelims airing on Facebook, I&#8217;ll be previewing six fights for tonight and providing quick picks for the other four un-aired preliminary bouts.  Let&#8217;s get to it.</p>
<p><strong>Preliminary Bout Quick Picks</strong></p>
<p>Todd Brown over Igor Pokrajac</p>
<p>How is Pokrajac still in the UFC?  He&#8217;s lost 3 out of 4 fights in the normally cut-happy promotion.</p>
<p>Rousimar Palhares over Dave Branch</p>
<p>Also my pick for &#8220;most likely to end in a gruesome, injury-causing submission&#8221;.</p>
<p>Dongi Yang over Rob Kimmons</p>
<p>Yang is over his UFC jitters and should take a competitive bout against the veteran Kimmons.</p>
<p>Takeya Mizugaki over Reuben Duran</p>
<p>How is Mizugaki, a top ten bantamweight, missing out on being featured on both the main card and the Facebook prelims portions of the event?</p>
<p>Shane Roller over Thiago Tavares</p>
<p>Roller grapples his way to a decision win in what could either be a compelling mat battle or a bit of a snoozefest.</p>
<p><strong>Facebook Prelims</strong></p>
<p><strong>Steve Cantwell vs. Cyrille Diabate</strong></p>
<p>Cantwell&#8217;s name is misleading, as he does everything pretty well.  He&#8217;s a competent, accurate striker, solid wrestler and has good submissions.  Meanwhile, Diabate&#8217;s skill set provides a more obvious path to victory, as his mat game is definitely his weakness.  However, he has outstanding kickboxing that provides a serious danger to foes.</p>
<p>Cantwell will have his moments, but I think that at some point Diabate will be able to catch Cantwell with something nasty and move in for the finish.  This is a winnable fight for both fighters, though, and Cantwell simply has to grind his way to a late stoppage or decision if he wants to have his hand raised.</p>
<p><strong>Prediction</strong>: Diabate by KO/TKO</p>
<p><strong>Danny Castillo vs. Joe Stevenson</strong></p>
<p>Castillo will debut in the UFC against tough veteran Stevenson in what should be an entertaining scrap.  Both guys will want to move forward all fight long, while their particular strategies within that mindset will vary.  Castillo will unleash powerful punches while Stevenson will use his striking to close the distance, wear out Castillo and take him down.</p>
<p>Castillo is far more likely to get a KO than Stevenson, but Stevenson is very good on the mat and will waste no time passing the guard and putting Castillo in bad positions should he get there.  I think he will and he will take a step toward returning to his former status of being just on the outside of the elite lightweights in this one.</p>
<p><strong>Prediction</strong>: Stevenson by submission</p>
<p><strong>Main Card Preview</strong></p>
<p><strong>Brian Bowles vs. Damacio Page</strong></p>
<p>We haven&#8217;t seen Bowles in awhile due to his propensity toward broken hands, but he brings his freaky similarity to Mark Wahlberg&#8217;s character in Boogie Nights to the UFC tonight against Page, who&#8217;s a tough character himself.  Bowles is just plain better, but Page is as tough as nails and opportunistic on the mat.</p>
<p>I think Bowles will have similar success to what he had in their first meeting, as he&#8217;ll have the power to make Page uncomfortable and the ability to finish the fight standing up or on the mat.  Page will rarely have breathing room in this one, as Bowles showcases his skills for a whole new set of fans.</p>
<p><strong>Prediction</strong>: Bowles by submission</p>
<p><strong>Alessio Sakara vs. Chris Weidman</strong></p>
<p>Style-wise, the matchup is a fairly friendly one for Weidman, who is a pretty good grappler with great takedowns.  However, Sakara has a huge edge in experience and any miscues on Weidman&#8217;s part will be harshly punished with Sakara&#8217;s more than capable standup.</p>
<p>One good aspect of striker vs. grappler matchups is that they provide a rather clear path to victory for each man.  Weidman was likely salivating when he watched tape of many of Sakara&#8217;s mat misadventures, but Sakara has improved and the bright lights of the UFC will provide another opponent for Weidman to contend with, too.  Weidman will unquestionably be better in the long run, but Sakara&#8217;s experience edge will be too much here.</p>
<p><strong>Prediction</strong>: Sakara by KO/TKO</p>
<p><strong>CB Dolloway vs. Mark Munoz</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m always intrigued by matchups between fighters with similar styles, particularly when it isn&#8217;t immediately clear which fighter is superior in that specific area. Therefore, this bout should be interesting and might even cross over into &#8220;entertaining&#8221;, as well. </p>
<p>Both have been your typical crossover athletes from college wrestling to MMA, and have had their share of respective successes while not adding the dynamic elements to their games that someone like Ryan Bader has.  Still, there is probably something to be said for Munoz&#8217;s power advantage, even if he&#8217;s a little sloppy with his striking.  I also expect Munoz to be stronger, though Dolloway may have more refined skills on the mat.  I&#8217;m not sure that will mean much if Dolloway is on his back, though, and while much of this fight will take place standing or in the clinch, I think Munoz will get more of those fight-sealing takedowns.</p>
<p><strong>Prediction</strong>: Munoz by decision</p>
<p><strong>Martin Kampmann vs. Diego Sanchez</strong></p>
<p>These two have both had their time as contenders in the welterweight division, and Sanchez memorably challenged BJ Penn for the lightweight title as well, though that obviously didn&#8217;t go so well for him.  Since then, Sanchez has rebounded nicely and apparently changed his life while attempting to get back on track in the division he made his name in.</p>
<p>Kampmann will enjoy a clear advantage while standing; Sanchez has capable striking but has never expanded beyond the basics, while Kampmann will use a variety of weapons to keep Sanchez guessing (and hurting).  If Sanchez gets the fight to the mat, Kampmann will be in trouble but should be able to survive.  He won&#8217;t submit Sanchez by any means, but Sanchez will control him and land shots consistently.  I just think Kampmann will be able to keep Sanchez off guard and fend off his takedowns tonight.</p>
<p><strong>Prediction</strong>: Kampmann by decision</p>
<p><a href="mailto:akathatoneguy@hotmail.com"><em>E-Mail Jon Hartley</a></em><strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/ufc-live-sanchez-vs-kampmann-preview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MMA Roundup: Sengoku, Diego Sanchez, Rashad Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/mma-roundup-sengoku-diego-sanchez-rashad-evans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/mma-roundup-sengoku-diego-sanchez-rashad-evans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hartley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MMA Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dana White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diego Sanchez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jorge Santiago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marlon Sandro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Hamill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quinton 'Rampage' Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rashad Evans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sengoku]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightmania.com/?p=6835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A while back, I gave some reasons that the Japanese MMA scene is in pretty grave danger, and with Sengoku losing top fighters left and right, it&#8217;s easy to see that harsh times are definitely ahead for Japanese MMA. We&#8217;ll discuss that in this edition of the MMA Roundup, along with the significance of Diego [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="highslide" onclick="return vz.expand(this)" href="http://www.fightmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/diego-sanchez.jpg"><img src="http://www.fightmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/diego-sanchez-300x157.jpg" alt="" title="diego sanchez" width="300" height="157" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6836" /></a>A while back, I gave some reasons that the Japanese MMA scene is in pretty grave danger, and with Sengoku losing top fighters left and right, it&#8217;s easy to see that harsh times are definitely ahead for Japanese MMA.  We&#8217;ll discuss that in this edition of the MMA Roundup, along with the significance of Diego Sanchez dropping his nickname, Rashad Evans&#8217; responses to criticism from Dana White, and some other recent stories.</p>
<p><strong>Santiago signs with UFC, Sandro headed to Bellator</strong></p>
<p>In my article on the problems facing Japanese MMA organizations such as Sengoku and Dream, I gave a few reasons that things could turn for the worse in the near future for those involved.  More than anything, the problem that will certainly hurt Sengoku&#8217;s chances to connect with a worldwide audience is their inability to hold on to non-Japanese stars.  While Japanese fans may continue to show up to see home-bred fighters compete, much of the credibility Sengoku enjoyed from having a few legitimate top ten fighters will be gone now that they are leaving for greener pastures.</p>
<p>First, there was the rumor that middleweight Jorge Santiago had signed with the UFC.  Santiago denied that the deal was done, but now it apparently is, as Santiago will return to the cage at UFC 130 against Brian Stann.  Since his initial UFC run, Santiago has won 11 of 12 fights and solidified himself as a high-level middleweight with a lot of potential.  He also put on one of last year&#8217;s best fights against Kazuo Misaki under the Sengoku banner.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Nova Uniao featherweight Marlon Sandro has left Sengoku in favor of Bellator Fighting Championships.  He will take part in the promotion&#8217;s upcoming fourth season, but will not be an entrant in the featherweight tournament, unfortunately.  Regardless, Bellator has added a legitimate top ten fighter to their roster with the signing, and an exciting one at that.</p>
<p>What is the impact for Sengoku, though?  To a North American fight fan like myself, these are major setbacks that indicate that things are going to continue to get worse for the Japanese promotion.  However, will losing Santiago and Sandro really affect Sengoku&#8217;s bottom line?  Japanese MMA fans do not have a history of latching on to foreign fighters, and it is unlikely that there will be a real change in interest from such fans towards Sengoku simply because Santiago and Sandro are gone.  Other promotions in Japan have succeeded without showing any real concern towards signing elite-level foreign fighters or even putting on bouts that are relevant to fans outside of the country.  Plus, being as they are not in a position yet financially to invest in appealing to fans elsewhere in the world, paying salaries that would compare to what Santiago and Sandro may expect in the future would be unnecessary.</p>
<p><strong>Sanchez drops &#8220;Nightmare&#8221; moniker</strong></p>
<p>What&#8217;s in a name?  According to Diego Sanchez, there&#8217;s a lot of significance in a fighter&#8217;s nickname, at least when it comes to his old &#8220;Nightmare&#8221; alias that he&#8217;s used throughout his career.  As part of an effort to turn his life around, Sanchez has decided to drop the nickname and simply be &#8220;Diego Sanchez&#8221; from this point forward.  While some may question what kind of tangible difference that will make to anyone besides Bruce Buffer, Sanchez believes that the symbolic change is very important.  He recently said: </p>
<p>&#8220;I let &#8216;The Nightmare&#8217; go. To me, I see some negative in it. A nightmare is something that is negative and kind of evil. I don&#8217;t want to represent that. I want to represent positivity and good. I look back on my career. &#8216;The Nightmare&#8217;? The nightmare was myself. All the times I fell off track and got into drinking, got into smoking weed, the things that brought me down, the partying. That was my nightmare. I was my own nightmare. I&#8217;m grown up. I&#8217;m going to let that name go. I just want to be Diego Sanchez. I don&#8217;t even need a nickname. I&#8217;m me.&#8221;</p>
<p>In reference to the difficulties he has recently overcome, he said:</p>
<p>&#8220;I went through a really rough situation in San Diego that brought me into a lot of emotional depression and that weighed hard on me, and the Penn fight was really hard for me the way I lost – getting cut up, getting hands put on me the way I did. That never happened to me in my career. So, I had to deal with that and when I came home I moved out of the city and I moved into the mountains and that was the best thing I ever did. I hit rock bottom after the Penn fight, I really did. I blew through all my money. I made bad decisions. Scam artists scammed me real bad. I was in debt over $175,000. I had to come back home. I needed my family&#8217;s love. I was humbled 100% back down to zero. I have no ego.&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyone who saw Sanchez&#8217;s <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63IY62tCMrs">funny-yet-sad drunken acceptance speech</a> at the 2009 Fighters Only MMA Awards understands that the man was going through some troubling times.  And of course, to a fighter who has regularly been dominant throughout his career, having the tables turned the way they were in the BJ Penn fight on the biggest stage of them all has to be difficult, as well.  I&#8217;ve never been a huge fan of Diego&#8217;s, but I&#8217;ve grown to appreciate his eccentricities and find his confidence and mannerisms to be pretty amusing.  Here&#8217;s hoping he&#8217;s gotten things figured out and can move forward.</p>
<p><strong>Rashad Evans questions Dana White&#8217;s criticism</strong></p>
<p>There&#8217;s no greater MMA expert in the world than Dana White, and he likes to make sure everyone knows it at all times.  Such was the case when he criticized one of his fighters&#8217; in-cage performances for the umpteenth time, saying that there&#8217;s no way he would do a Rashad Evans-Quinton &#8220;Rampage&#8221; Jackson rematch because the first fight was a &#8220;fucking snoozefest&#8221;.  Puzzlingly enough, he instead booked Rampage to face Matt Hamill, who isn&#8217;t exactly lining the walls of his gym with &#8220;Fight of the Night&#8221; awards.</p>
<p>In response, Evans said to MMAFighting.com, &#8220;That&#8217;s okay. He can say our fight was boring, but I have a different perspective [from] being in the fight. There was a lot of points in that fight where my heart rate got up a little bit, so I could never agree that that fight was boring. He says a Hamill fight would be more exciting? I mean, we&#8217;ll see. Hamill has pretty much the same style that I have, so we&#8217;ll see if Hamill&#8217;s able to make it more exciting than I was. If he&#8217;s saying it was boring because of me, I don&#8217;t understand that. I watched the Machida and Rampage fight, and that fight was pretty boring to me.&#8221;</p>
<p>Remember, fighters, it&#8217;s not your job to win&#8230;it&#8217;s your job to be exciting!  Sure, if you lose fights that you should have won because you decide to please the fans and Dana White by letting it all hang out, you&#8217;ll still get cut and have to fight at regional shows for a fraction of what you used to make.  But hey, don&#8217;t worry about that.  Also, who else wants to bet that the choice has more to do with wanting Rampage to have a winnable fight (being that he&#8217;s a marketable fighter who needs to stay relevant) than anything else?  I mean, Evans put it best- Hamill isn&#8217;t a more exciting fighter than Evans is, anyway.</p>
<p>I had thought that White had taken to a new level of sophistication after his surprisingly mature remarks about Miguel Torres&#8217; jab-heavy strategy against Antonio Banuelos, but it looks like he was just not himself that day.  He still wants to see Rock &#8216;Em-Sock &#8216;Em Robots out there, wins and losses be damned.  Again, I could understand that sentiment a little more if he wasn&#8217;t cutting legitimately exciting fighters left and right for losing a couple of times in a row.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:akathatoneguy@hotmail.com"><em>E-Mail Jon Hartley</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/mma-roundup-sengoku-diego-sanchez-rashad-evans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 Fightmania Awards, Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/2010-fightmania-awards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/2010-fightmania-awards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hartley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MMA Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Pettis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BJ Penn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brock Lesnar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Leben]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Henderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diego Sanchez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fabricio Werdum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedor Emelianenko]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frankie Edgar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Sotiropoulos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hathaway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Russow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Daley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robbie Lawler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Bader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shane Carwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strikeforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strikeforce: Fedor vs. Werdum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strikeforce: St. Louis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFC 116]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WEC 53]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightmania.com/?p=6488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year was another memorable one for a sport that continues to grow, as we saw a major organization close its doors, champions lose their titles and fights that will be remembered for years to come. Of course, we also had an unforgettable off-the-cage kick courtesy of Anthony Pettis to top things off. Here is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="highslide" onclick="return vz.expand(this)" href="http://www.fightmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/lawler-lindland.jpg"><img src="http://www.fightmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/lawler-lindland-300x178.jpg" alt="" title="Robbie Lawler vs Matt Lindland" width="300" height="178" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6492" /></a>Last year was another memorable one for a sport that continues to grow, as we saw a major organization close its doors, champions lose their titles and fights that will be remembered for years to come.  Of course, we also had an unforgettable off-the-cage kick courtesy of Anthony Pettis to top things off.  Here is part one of my choices for the best performers and performances in a number of categories in 2010.<br />
<strong><br />
Event of the Year</strong>- UFC 116</p>
<p>I had three events by three different promotions in the running for the top event of the year- UFC 116, WEC 53 and Strikeforce: St. Louis.  All three were fantastic shows, and best of all, two of them didn&#8217;t even require a pay-per-view purchase.</p>
<p>WEC 53 carries a lot of momentum for not only having great fights, but also some historical and even sentimental meaning for MMA fans.  Since it was the last WEC show we would ever see, it had a certain <em>gravitas</em> that other shows would be hard-pressed to compete with.  The fights lived up to the show&#8217;s importance, as Anthony Pettis and Ben Henderson put on what I consider to be the best fight of the year.  One of the more violent finishes of the year (Eddie Wineland&#8217;s slam KO of Ken Stone) wasn&#8217;t even shown on television, as Stone was down for ten minutes after the slam.  Save for two bouts, all of the preliminary bouts had finishes.  Dominick Cruz put on yet another dominant display against Scott Jorgensen, for good measure.  If we had seen more of the great preliminary bouts on television, maybe this show would have gotten even more recognition.</p>
<p>Strikeforce: St. Louis didn&#8217;t have any real historical value, at least not like the final WEC show did.  What it did have was plenty of violent finishes and great action.  It was simply an excellent card that surprised many who were smart enough to watch it, and made the TUF 12 Finale, which aired on the same night, pale in comparison.  The main card had four straight fights that built the level of violence up to a crescendo of sorts.  First, Antonio Silva somehow recovered from being dropped by Mike Kyle to win via a second round TKO.  Then, Robbie Lawler knocked out Matt Lindland with one of the best KOs of the year.  Then, Paul Daley stopped Scott Smith in sickening fashion with an even <em>better</em> knockout.  By the time Dan Henderson put away Renato &#8220;Babalu&#8221; Sobral in under two minutes in the night&#8217;s main event, commentator Mauro Ranallo was reduced to excitedly screaming out what didn&#8217;t even appear to be distinguishable words.  It was just that kind of night.</p>
<p>Ultimately, I went with UFC 116 because it had a more well-rounded selection of fights from top to bottom.  It&#8217;s easy to forget now that everyone has suddenly agreed that Brock Lesnar &#8220;sucks&#8221; and Shane Carwin has been all but forgotten, but Lesnar-Carwin was the most anticipated heavyweight MMA bout in history, and it delivered.  Lesnar&#8217;s comeback was possibly the best of the year, and while rewatching it, you still can&#8217;t comprehend how he could have escaped the first round intact.</p>
<p>Another great fight on the same card was Chris Leben&#8217;s excellent bout with Yoshihiro Akiyama, which Leben surprisingly won with a triangle choke.  The fight was one of the best of the year, and the submission was one of the better ones, as well.  Chris Lytle and Matt Brown had an entertaining war on the mat before Lytle finished Brown with a nasty straight armbar.  Stephan Bonnar beat Krzysztof Soszynski in a fantastic fight, and to top it all off, we had Gerald Harris&#8217;s slam KO of Dave Branch on the prelims, too.</p>
<p><strong>Upset of the Year</strong>- Fabricio Werdum defeats Fedor Emelianenko, Strikeforce: Fedor vs. Werdum</p>
<p>I really hate picking an upset where the winner is a top ten fighter, but this one leaves me no choice.  After all, Fedor Emelianenko had never lost by knockout, submission or decision in his career, as his lone loss was due to a suspect stoppage due to a cut 11 years ago against Tsuyoshi Kosaka in Rings.  Also, while it&#8217;s clear now that Werdum had the chops to submit Fedor, I can&#8217;t deny that my jaw dropped when I saw it.  Seeing Fedor Emelianenko tap out for the first time was a strange thing, indeed.</p>
<p>Other candidates included BJ Penn first loss to Frankie Edgar while dropping his UFC Lightweight Championship.  However, Edgar&#8217;s first win was a very close decision that many thought Penn should have won, so it pales in comparison to someone defeating Fedor by submission in 69 seconds.  Other candidates included John Hathaway defeating Diego Sanchez and Mike Russow&#8217;s win over Todd Duffee.</p>
<p><strong>Breakout Fighter of the Year</strong>- Anthony Pettis</p>
<p>This is one of my favorite categories.  It&#8217;s always great to see someone come either out of nowhere to become a well-known fighter or to take that &#8220;next step&#8221; from being a prodigy to being an elite fighter.  This year, several fighters took that step.  However, from knocking out experienced fighters to putting on the fight of his life against the WEC Lightweight Champion and a legitimate top ten fighter to boot, I ended up choosing Pettis.</p>
<p>My top candidates for this one were Pettis, Jon Jones, George Sotiropoulos, Ryan Bader, Phil Davis and Evan Dunham.  First, I should clarify that I don&#8217;t include fighters who I had ranked inside the top ten of their respective weight divisions before 2010 began.  I went with Pettis because I thought he made the biggest splash of this list, but really you could select any of these guys and I wouldn&#8217;t put up a huge fight over it.</p>
<p>Some may say that Bader already broke out since he won &#8220;The Ultimate Fighter&#8221;, but I have to disagree, especially seeing how the UFC brings show winners along fairly slowly these days.  Sotiropoulos and Jones would be easy choices, and I thought long and hard over whether they deserved it the most.  Meanwhile, Phil Davis is very overlooked (although I don&#8217;t know how at this point) and is a favorite to take this award home next year.  Dunham also deserves a look, and I don&#8217;t count the Sherk loss against him since it was an awful decision by the judges.</p>
<p>Be sure to check back for the rest of my choices, including fighter of the year, in part two of our 2010 awards.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:akathatoneguy@hotmail.com"><em>E-Mail Jon Hartley</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/2010-fightmania-awards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UFC 121 Parting Shots</title>
		<link>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/ufc-121-parting-shots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/ufc-121-parting-shots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hartley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MMA Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diego Sanchez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabriel Gonzaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Shields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Kampmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Hamill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paulo Thiago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tito Ortiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFC 121]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightmania.com/?p=5755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, let&#8217;s draw a line in the sand, here. We&#8217;re all a little Cain-ed out. Nobody is sad by now that Brocktober came to an abrupt end, either. Nearly all of the post-UFC talk has been about the heavyweight title bout, which makes sense, but that doesn&#8217;t keep it from getting a bit tiresome. So, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="highslide" onclick="return vz.expand(this)" href="http://www.fightmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/diego-sanchez.jpg"><img src="http://www.fightmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/diego-sanchez-300x157.jpg" alt="" title="diego sanchez" width="300" height="157" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5756" /></a>Okay, let&#8217;s draw a line in the sand, here.  We&#8217;re all a little Cain-ed out.  Nobody is sad by now that Brocktober came to an abrupt end, either.  Nearly all of the post-UFC talk has been about the heavyweight title bout, which makes sense, but that doesn&#8217;t keep it from getting a bit tiresome.  So, I&#8217;m going to do my best to make this a Cain-and-Brock-free look back at UFC 121.</p>
<p><strong>The more things change&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Most of the time, fights are interesting, even if they aren&#8217;t particularly entertaining, because they either answer some questions we have about certain fighters, settle a debate or a rankings issue, or give us a new perspective on one or both competitors.  Sometimes, though, you have a fight where nothing new is learned, and both parties perform just as they always have, and just as they were expected to.</p>
<p>Such was the case with the fight between Tito Ortiz and Matt Hamill.</p>
<p>Through three rounds, Ortiz did his best to translate his meat-and-potatoes boxing attack to success.  Straight punches, a little head movement, and all with an unnaturally-stiff look to it.  Nothing new there.  Meanwhile, Hamill left his hands down, threw an ugly-but-effective jab and plenty of looping punches, along with a few effective takedowns and some good ground and pound.  Nothing new there, either.</p>
<p>Before the fight, most people assumed that Ortiz was essentially done, if not as a participant in the sport, at least as a <em>relevant</em> participant.  Also, Hamill was seen as a talented enough fighter, but not someone that we would expect to include in the light heavyweight top ten or to see in a title bout at any point in the future.  </p>
<p>Again, nothing changed on either count.</p>
<p>Then again, maybe that&#8217;s not such a bad thing.  At least, it&#8217;s not so bad if you&#8217;re trying to predict these damn fights.  With all of the upsets, surprises and disappointments that are just part of the expected proceedings of an MMA event by now, a fight that goes just as expected is actually an <em>unexpected</em> thing.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also a good lesson for someone such as myself, who constantly expects fighters to overcome their more recent shortcomings to reach their former level of performance or their perceived potential (see: Ortiz, Gabriel Gonzaga).</p>
<p>Sometimes, what you see is what you get, and I suppose there&#8217;s nothing wrong with that.</p>
<p>Ortiz may get another fight in the UFC, or he may not.  I&#8217;m not sure that it matters.  If he gets anyone who is even in the neighborhood of the top ten, he&#8217;s going to have an uphill battle and will probably just end up with another loss.  It&#8217;s doubtful that Dana White will give Ortiz an easy fight to get back on track, since there doesn&#8217;t appear to be any long-term benefit in doing so.  He&#8217;ll end up in Strikeforce or elsewhere, and he&#8217;ll trade wins and losses and provide some entertainment, and that&#8217;s alright.  His place in MMA history is already secured.</p>
<p><strong>Go, Diego, go!</strong></p>
<p>Speaking of believing that fighters will reach their old levels of performance, the first round of Diego Sanchez&#8217;s fight with Paulo Thiago was pretty scary for anyone who had money on Sanchez, for sure.  Although I&#8217;m convinced of Sanchez&#8217;s talent and determination, he has shown to be a bit of a front runner in that when someone really puts it on him early in a fight, he doesn&#8217;t bring the same intensity level (though he&#8217;s a game opponent, either way).</p>
<p>Therefore, it was impressive to see Sanchez come back from dropping the first round clearly in the eyes of just about everyone but judge Luis Cobian to steamroll Thiago in the last two rounds.  Sanchez certainly still has the skills to be a top five welterweight, and the move back to Greg Jackson&#8217;s camp was a good decision on his part.  Who knows?  Maybe he could be a future champ after all, and he needed those losses to get his head together.</p>
<p>As for Thiago, he is a very good fighter, but looks to be one that will remain just outside of the elite in the division.  He can occasionally beat a top welterweight (like Koscheck), but will usually lose to legit top ten guys (Fitch, Sanchez).  That said, he&#8217;ll be a mainstay in the division for years to come, if used correctly.</p>
<p><strong>What&#8217;s wrong with Gonzaga?</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s the same old story with Gabriel Gonzaga.  The guy could be a monster, but he gets in there and doesn&#8217;t look like he even knows if he wants to <em>fight</em>.  Through three rounds with Brendan Schaub, Gonzaga generally stood as still as a statue, absorbing shots from his more mobile opponent while offering little in his own defense.</p>
<p>This is nothing new with Gonzaga, either.  Remember his first fight in the UFC against Kevin Jordan?  If you don&#8217;t, it&#8217;s for good reason&#8230;the two danced around one another for three full rounds in one of the most boring fights of 2005, before Gonzaga improbably launched a Superman punch in the closing seconds of the fight that knocked Jordan out cold.  It was essentially Mir-Cro Cop with even less activity.</p>
<p>Five years later, it is obviously too late to expect Gonzaga to ever meet his potential.  While watching his corner calmly speak to him between rounds, I had to wonder whether some urgency on somebody, <em>anybody&#8217;s</em> part should have been shown.  Maybe a change of scenery or even some talk with a sports psychologist is in order&#8230;or maybe Gonzaga just doesn&#8217;t want to be in there.  </p>
<p><strong>Quick Shots</strong></p>
<p>&#8211;Dana White couldn&#8217;t have been pleased with Jake Shields&#8217; performance against Martin Kampmann.  He obviously didn&#8217;t want to put Jon Fitch in for a title shot with GSP, but Shields&#8217; showing didn&#8217;t exactly build demand for GSP-Shields, either.  Meanwhile, a Fitch-Shields fight risks backfiring if Fitch is able to win, and even more likely, could result in another underwhelming Shields performance that won&#8217;t help sell a title fight.</p>
<p><em><a href="mailto:akathatoneguy@hotmail.com">E-Mail Jon Hartley</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/ufc-121-parting-shots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UFC 121: Post-Fight Press Conference (Video)</title>
		<link>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-videos/interviews/ufc-121-post-fight-press-conference-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-videos/interviews/ufc-121-post-fight-press-conference-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brock Lesnar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cain Velasquez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diego Sanchez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paulo Thiago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFC 121]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightmania.com/?p=5714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the UFC 121: Lesnar vs. Velasquez post-fight press conference. The UFC handed out $70,000 bonus checks for &#8220;Fight of the Night,&#8221; &#8220;Knockout of the Night&#8221; and &#8220;Submission of the Night.&#8221; &#8220;Knockout of the Night&#8221; bonus went to Cain Velasquez for his TKO of former UFC heavyweight titleholder Brock Lesnar. &#8220;Submission of the Night&#8221; bonus [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://storefront.contentdirect.tv/Player.aspx?systemId=595e115b-bf6c-4485-b549-3d0356c653c3&#038;channelId=a56d84e5-f2a7-4f88-9e92-356e993fc5b1&#038;width=450&#038;height=419" height="419" frameborder="0" width="450" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the UFC 121: Lesnar vs. Velasquez post-fight press conference.</p>
<p>The UFC handed out $70,000 bonus checks for &#8220;Fight of the Night,&#8221; &#8220;Knockout of the Night&#8221; and &#8220;Submission of the Night.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Knockout of the Night&#8221; bonus went to Cain Velasquez for his TKO of former UFC heavyweight titleholder Brock Lesnar.</p>
<p>&#8220;Submission of the Night&#8221; bonus went to Daniel Roberts for his guillotine choke win over Mike “The Joker” Guymon.</p>
<p>&#8220;Fight of the Night&#8221; bonus went to Diego Sanchez and Paulo Thiago for their back and forth 3 round battle that resulted in a unanimous decision win for Sanchez.</p>
<p>Total bonus money awarded following UFC 121 was $280,000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-videos/interviews/ufc-121-post-fight-press-conference-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UFC 121 Mailbag</title>
		<link>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/ufc-121-mailbag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/ufc-121-mailbag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 05:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hartley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MMA Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brock Lesnar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cain Velasquez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diego Sanchez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Shields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Kampmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paulo Thiago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tito Ortiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFC 121]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightmania.com/?p=5706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every now and then, there&#8217;s an event that deserves its very own mailbag. UFC 121 was precisely such an event, with heavyweight superhero/pariah Brock Lesnar losing his title and several more head-scratchers in the form of judges&#8217; scorecards. Let&#8217;s hop right into this mailbag and see what people are saying. Brock Talk Finally, that cocky [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="highslide" onclick="return vz.expand(this)" href="http://www.fightmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/tito.jpg"><img src="http://www.fightmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/tito-300x197.jpg" alt="" title="tito" width="300" height="197" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5707" /></a>Every now and then, there&#8217;s an event that deserves its very own mailbag.  UFC 121 was precisely such an event, with heavyweight superhero/pariah Brock Lesnar losing his title and several more head-scratchers in the form of judges&#8217; scorecards.  Let&#8217;s hop right into this mailbag and see what people are saying.</p>
<p><strong>Brock Talk</strong></p>
<p><em>Finally, that cocky jerk gets the beatdown that he deserves.  He never really deserved the spot that he had, and has been over hyped from the start!</em><br />
&#8211;<strong>James from Ohio</strong></p>
<p><em>Hahahahaha, it was great seeing Brock get beat tonight!  I&#8217;m not a huge Cain fan, but he&#8217;s a way better fighter than the one-dimensional Lesnar ever was.</em><br />
&#8211;<strong>Bill from Pasadena, California</strong> </p>
<p>One sad part of MMA is the revisionist history that immediately takes place when a highly-touted fighter suffers an inevitable defeat.  All of a sudden, the former UFC Heavyweight Champion was a hyped up, one-dimensional fraud who was built up to be marketed to dumb pro wrestling fans?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not buying it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always hated hearing people say that someone like Lesnar is one-dimensional.  He comes from an amateur wrestling background.  Sure, his takedowns come from that specific area, but what about his ground-and-pound?  Is that not a skill?  And if not, why don&#8217;t we see fellow wrestlers like Lesnar&#8217;s training partner Cole Konrad pounding out top heavyweights within a round or two?</p>
<p>Did they teach Lesnar how to submit someone with an arm triangle or pin them against a cage while in half-guard during his days at the University of Minnesota?  Sorry, but if you think Lesnar&#8217;s just using &#8220;wrestling&#8221; in there, you&#8217;re mistaken.  Brazilian jiu-jitsu doesn&#8217;t just mean slapping triangle chokes on people from the guard.  It also means good, solid top control and positioning.  Furthermore, I doubt they worked on ground strikes during Lesnar&#8217;s college wrestling practices.</p>
<p>Also, I don&#8217;t get the whole thing where people immediately discredit the loser of a fight while talking up the winner.  If Lesnar was never really that good, what does it say about Cain Velasquez?  Furthermore, what does it say about the entire UFC heavyweight division?  Are we to believe that the only good heavyweight in the world is Fedor Emelianenko?  Oh, wait&#8230;he lost to Fabricio Werdum, who only had moderate success in the UFC, so what do we take away from all of this?</p>
<p>I prefer to think of Lesnar as an amazing athlete and an absolute beast who fought another top-notch heavyweight and got beaten.  This kind of thing happens in MMA.  The sky isn&#8217;t falling, and the heavyweight title will be in the hands of either Velasquez, Lesnar or Shane Carwin for some time to come, I think.</p>
<p><em>What&#8217;s your take on the judging from the event?  I thought Martin Kampmann got screwed.</em><br />
<strong>DZ from Florida</strong></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about that; it was probably too close to say that anyone could have been &#8220;screwed&#8221;.  I do think that Nelson Hamilton is a bit crazy for giving all three rounds to Shields, as I think Kampmann clearly took the second round.  You can&#8217;t give a guy that much credit for getting full mount if he doesn&#8217;t do anything with the position and his opponent escapes almost immediately.  How does that trump the landing of significant strikes and a deep submission attempt?</p>
<p>Along those lines, I also think that Luis Cobian must be out of his damn mind to have given Diego Sanchez all three rounds over Paulo Thiago.  How did Thiago not clearly win round one?  It&#8217;s insane?  Thankfully, Sanchez deserved to win the fight, but hearing that 30-26 scorecard just reminds you of how bad MMA judging continues to be. I think judges should have to explain their decisions or make themselves available to the media after fights, just like the fighters themselves.  Why can&#8217;t we ask Cobian what he was thinking?</p>
<p>Two other fighters on the undercard were given what were apparently very suspect decisions, as Chris Camozzi won a split decision over Dongi Yang, while Paul Taylor was said to have been screwed over by split decision against Sam Stout.  I haven&#8217;t seen either fight, but at this point I will be more likely to believe those who saw the fights live, rather than to give the judges the benefit of the doubt.</p>
<p><em>Is Tito Ortiz done?  He certainly looks like it, from the performance he put on against Matt Hamill.  He looked to be about 1,000 years old and had no answers for what seemed to be a very obvious strategy from Matt Hamill, either.</em><br />
<strong>Scott from England</strong></p>
<p>Yeah, I think he is.  He may not retire, but I expect him to be cut from the UFC since he makes a ton of money and doesn&#8217;t have a whole lot left to offer.  Is he good enough to fight competitively?  Sure, he is.  But is the UFC going to keep shelling out money to have Ortiz face the likes of Vladimir Matyushenko or Stephan Bonnar?  I highly doubt it.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s absolutely done as any kind of a contender.  I don&#8217;t think he even showed that he could be the Strikeforce champ at 205 pounds during the Hamill fight.  His previous strengths- his cardio and his wrestling- are no longer great assets and his striking hasn&#8217;t visibly improved over his last several fights.  Aside from that, all of the injuries and long periods of inactivity have clearly taken their toll on him, as well.</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t think that Ortiz will retire.  He doesn&#8217;t seem ready to do so, and like I said, it&#8217;s not as if this is a situation where Ortiz is just too old to even compete.  If he doesn&#8217;t mind silly things like hurting his &#8220;legacy&#8221; or isn&#8217;t opposed to taking a pay cut to fight in Strikeforce or elsewhere, he can certainly keep on fighting.  However, even if he had somehow beaten Hamill, he just didn&#8217;t look good in the process.  His athleticism, speed, cardio and overall effectiveness as a fighter have all been hampered by his age and injury history, and there&#8217;s no turning back.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:akathatoneguy@hotmail.com"><em>E-Mail Jon Hartley</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/ufc-121-mailbag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UFC 121 Main Card: Preview and Picks</title>
		<link>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/ufc-121-main-card-preview-and-picks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/ufc-121-main-card-preview-and-picks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 23:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hartley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MMA Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brendan Schaub]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brock Lesnar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cain Velasquez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diego Sanchez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabriel Gonzaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Shields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Kampmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Hamill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paulo Thiago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tito Ortiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFC 121]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightmania.com/?p=5693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As compelling as the Brock Lesnar-Shane Carwin bout was, Lesnar&#8217;s face-off with Cain Velasquez may be even more interesting. Of course, there are plenty of other fights to look forward to, as well. We also have Jake Shields&#8217; UFC debut to anticipate, as well as a Tito Ortiz appearance! Let&#8217;s get right to it. Brendan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="highslide" onclick="return vz.expand(this)" href="http://www.fightmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/brock-lesnar.jpg"><img src="http://www.fightmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/brock-lesnar-300x189.jpg" alt="" title="brock lesnar" width="300" height="189" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5694" /></a>As compelling as the Brock Lesnar-Shane Carwin bout was, Lesnar&#8217;s face-off with Cain Velasquez may be even more interesting.  Of course, there are plenty of other fights to look forward to, as well.  We also have Jake Shields&#8217; UFC debut to anticipate, as well as a Tito Ortiz appearance!  Let&#8217;s get right to it.</p>
<p><strong>Brendan Schaub vs. Gabriel Gonzaga</strong></p>
<p>Long-time Fightmania readers know that I&#8217;ve always liked Gonzaga, who has plenty of skills but has had trouble finding any sort of consistency in his UFC performances.  Meanwhile, Schaub is an ex-NFL player from &#8220;The Ultimate Fighter&#8221; that has looked very impressive in his UFC fights since the show ended.</p>
<p>Schaub is very athletic, but I can&#8217;t see him muscling around Gonzaga, who poses a lot of matchup problems with his size, striking ability and grappling skills.  I do expect Schaub to be quicker, and maybe he can even take Gonzaga down, but to what end?  Gonzaga is very dangerous on the mat, and a takedown may be a bad idea on Schaub&#8217;s part.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m tempted to pick Schaub, but in the end I&#8217;ll pick Gonzaga.  I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see it go either way, though.</p>
<p><strong>Prediction</strong>: Gonzaga by KO/TKO</p>
<p><strong>Tito Ortiz vs. Matt Hamill</strong></p>
<p>Ah, the &#8220;coach vs. mentor&#8221; matchup.  I once theorized that Ortiz cultivated a close relationship with Hamill, who is an outstanding wrestler, in order to avoid having to face him in the future.  If that was the idea, it didn&#8217;t work, though Hamill&#8217;s performances since &#8220;The Ultimate Fighter 4&#8243; don&#8217;t exactly spell instant doom for Ortiz.</p>
<p>This is a hard fight to predict because you don&#8217;t know which version of either fighter will show up.  Ortiz has been ravaged by injuries and inactivity over the last few years, and I don&#8217;t know if anyone really knows what he even has left in the tank at this point.  Meanwhile, Hamill has never been content to rely on his wrestling the way that any sane person would, instead choosing to slug it out with superior strikers such as Rich Franklin.</p>
<p>Many are saying Hamill will have the best cardio, which is funny because Ortiz once had the best cardio in the sport.  I&#8217;ll make a dangerous choice here and take Ortiz&#8217;s words at face value and assume that his suspect cardio in recent fights was really just the result of injuries.  I&#8217;ll also dangerously assume that Ortiz is healthy, since he didn&#8217;t pull out of this fight like the Chuck Liddell one.</p>
<p>I think Ortiz could outpoint Hamill on strikes, though I have no idea how I expect the wrestling to end up.  Ortiz has never been terribly effective at standing up after being taken down, but his takedown defense should be pretty good.  Hamill&#8217;s power is overrated, and I don&#8217;t know if he&#8217;ll land a whole lot on Ortiz, anyway.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll go with Ortiz in what could be an underwhelming fight.</p>
<p><strong>Prediction</strong>: Ortiz by decision</p>
<p><strong>Diego Sanchez vs. Paulo Thiago</strong></p>
<p>Sanchez was once pegged as a future champion in the welterweight division, and now is trying to simply get a win after a failed lightweight experiment and an unsuccessful return to his natural weight class against John Hathaway.  Thiago is a tough opponent to try to get back on track against, as he has good power in both hands and a great all-around skill set.</p>
<p>The question is: can Diego go back to being the suffocating grappler that he once was?  Can he confidently put the pressure on for the duration of the fight and wear out opponents like before?  I think he can for this fight, at least.</p>
<p><strong>Prediction</strong>: Sanchez by KO/TKO</p>
<p><strong>Jake Shields vs. Martin Kampmann</strong></p>
<p>Shields comes over as the reigning Strikeforce Middleweight Champion, although he has chosen to compete at 170 pounds in the UFC.  Kampmann was fairly recently seen as a possible title contender, but a loss to Paul Daley derailed that train for a moment.  This fight is seen as possibly being for a title shot, and if I know Dana White, it will be.  There&#8217;s no way he&#8217;s going to push Jon Fitch ahead of one of these two (barring injury), and he&#8217;s not going to let Fitch possibly tarnish his prime free agency signing before he gets to market GSP-Shields, either.</p>
<p>So, I kind of tipped my hand there&#8230;Shields is gonna win this one.  That&#8217;s no real surprise, though.  As much as Kampmann has rounded out his ground game to supplement his striking, he won&#8217;t be able to defend Shields&#8217; takedowns, and he also isn&#8217;t going to submit Shields from his back, for that matter.  Shields is going to win a pretty &#8220;paint-by-numbers&#8217; matchup.</p>
<p><strong>Prediction</strong>: Shields by submission</p>
<p><strong>Brock Lesnar vs. Cain Velasquez</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s so hard to envision what a Lesnar fight will look like.  It&#8217;s hard to imagine, but we&#8217;ve still only seen this guy a handful of times.  Still, this fight will answer most of the remaining questions about Lesnar.  Velasquez possesses a better mix of technical striking and wrestling than anyone Lesnar has ever faced, and probably anyone else in the heavyweight division today.</p>
<p>Lesnar simply has to get takedowns for this fight to go his way.  Standing up with Velasquez, he would always have the chance to land a kill shot, but he would also be on the receiving end of plenty of punches from a quicker, better striker that packs plenty of power himself.  Velasquez is capable of leg-kicking Lesnar, but I wouldn&#8217;t anticipate that until later on in the fight, as it would open him up to being taken down by the champ.</p>
<p>If either fighter is taken down, he will be in big trouble.  This isn&#8217;t just because neither fighter is particularly skilled off of his back, but also because both fighters are such devastating strikers on the mat. Lesnar in particular is dangerous to have on top of you, and we know now that he&#8217;s willing to pass the guard and attempt submissions from dominant positions, too.</p>
<p>Everyone is expecting that Velasquez will be better off in the later rounds because of his cardio, and that may be true, but Lesnar is always in great shape, as well.  The advantage may be there, but it won&#8217;t be as huge as people are making it out to be.</p>
<p>To me, Velasquez doesn&#8217;t win this bout unless he can survive until the later rounds and avoid being taken down early.  I think Lesnar will be able to get early takedowns, so I give him this one.</p>
<p><strong>Prediction</strong>: Lesnar by KO/TKO</p>
<p><a href="mailto:akathatoneguy@hotmail.com"><em>E-Mail Jon Hartley</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fightmania.com/mma-editorials/ufc-121-main-card-preview-and-picks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

